The AHA Moment!
I realy didn't get on very well at school. It wasn't that I didn't understand what I was being taught, it was just that a lot of it realy didn't make sense.
For instance, I didn't like the idea of 0 or the 0 Matrix.
Frankly it just didn't make sense. Still I did learn it.
What I didn't like was that zero was a made up construct. It was a concept.
Nothing that I could see or touch was nothing, it was always something.
The thoughts of Nature having a 'nothing' was quite scary, especially when I read C.S.Lewis.
I didn't like the idea of 'Nothing' being able to eat up Everything. I didn't mind Binary, because then it was a symbol to say that the Nothing and the One were doing something useful together.
Anyway I was looking at some colour values for my picture of 'The Silver Tree at Loch Lomand' using the Munsell colour diagram.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munsell_color_system
Also having worked with the International Colour Code (ICC) for years since being a Hairdresser, (The first thing we learn about colouring Hair) It is a nice rational system to do all sorts of interesting things with colour.
I Suddenly realised that Miss Penny Lion's 'Special Silver Counting' Button is a very deep response in me, rejecting the whole concept of Maths as I was taught it.
I also have a very deep conviction that the more we try to calculate 'Nothing', the more we are creating a kind of 'void' that can't be filled. Like the prophetic narrative in C.S.Lewis.
As you have gathered I am deeply into Bible stuff. And I have been having some pretty wierd dreams lately!
How does it make you feel when someone says 'you have Nothing of value to me'? People always have something of value. It's just that you might not want to 'trade' with them.
I just suddenly realised that we have created 'Black Holes' in space.... mathematically. The maths we use says they are there. So we look so hard for them we wear out the garment of the night sky.
There isn't a 4th dimension, it is a mathematical construct. It collapses into 2 dimensional line. I know that from writing Orthodox Icons. The 'Line', is a defined boundry.
We can only construct The fourth dimension using a 0, a conceptual nothing. I am sorry but those '4 dimension' box diagrams just look like flat shapes to me.
This I am sure is why the first commandment says;
NIV (You would realy need a copy to see what I mean)Exodus CH19 v 25 ends;
So Moses went down to the people and told them.
Title; The Ten Commandments
a b
CH20 And God spoke ......... all these words
v2 I am the Lord Your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.
Well I am sorry but in my book slavery means working for NOTHING! and THATS A LOT OF NOTHING!
Verse 2 means to be saved from working hard without a sense of building something for the future. In this case it is probably translated as a homeland, and personal identity, as a corperate body of people, and as individuals and families.
The point I am making here is that God Created, and he didn't use a Zero! God didn't create Everything from Nothing, He made it as a reflection of His Pre-existancy. I think it might have just looked like a massive firework display, and you know how well planned they have to be to get a fantastic bit of illumination.
{ And God spoke....... all these words }
is the only un-numbered verse I have found in my Bible.
This verse has a Syntax of two parts. It represents the expanse of time and duration. It represents cogniscent clearly defined thought, and it represents a singular purpose. (Which is a tri-partate unison).
So if I were to write God mathematically it would be as a 1 and always as a one.
So I did a diagram at the top of the page.
The Ten Commandments are set out as Five positive Commands, and Five Negative Commands.
No Gaps!
1. You Shall have No other Gods Before Me.
2. You shall not make for yourself an Idol in the form of anything in the heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below.
3. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; ..... Jelous! Showing Love to a Thousand Generations.
4. You shall not misuse the name of the Lord Your God, ...
5. You Shall Remember the Sabbath.
6. Honour your Father and Mother
7. You shall not Murder
8. You shall not commit Adultery
9. You shall not steal
10. You shall not give false testamony against your Neighbour
11. a)You shall not covet your neighbours house. b)You shall not covet your neighbours wife. c) or his manservant or maidservant. d) His Ox or his donkey, (Read that as his car or his motorbike) c) or anything that belongs to your neighbour.
Thats odd, I seem to have upgraded part (b) of commantment two as I usually read it to being another whole commandment. We do seem to have a dreadful problem with 'idol' worship in this Babylon of a sociey we live in.
Or actually is that clause 2 in commandment ten that has the five codicils?
I have always had trouble counting these commandments, because I count a commandment starting with a 'You shall', or a 'You shall not'. I always got 11.
The Jesus commandment was 'To Love thy neighbour as thyself'. Well you can't love somebody else properly if you don't love God first. See Commandment 1... When you love God, you also have a deep respect for Him.
To have respect for God means you also have respect for yourself.
So to say we have 'self respect' when we do not have God at the absolute centre of our lives is the most scandalous IDOLATARY!!!
Anyway, you have just read the 'riot act', according to God.
Penny Lion is going to teach Tuppeny Bear to count without a Zero!
Just think of 1 being middle C on the Piano. It doesn't matter if you are going below middle C or above it, or which finger you play it with.
There just isn't a note on the Piano that doesn't play if it's hammer strikes home!
The reason I have never been able to get my head around the way other people think is Birthdays.
I will be '54' in August. Now to me, the day after my birthday, I am in my 55th year.
When I was born, I was in my first year. I was always 'nearly' my next birthday after my birthday.
I wonder if anyone has considered re-calculating that old Mayan prophecy with the lunar calender. Either the actual method of calculations they used, or using the planetary drift calculations since the last 25,000 years?
How about using the actual Jewish Lunar calender to calculate the Daniel dream, and all the other prophecies?
As far as I am concerned, If Tuppeny Bear spends all his Lovely Brown Buttons, Penny Lion will always be able to share Her Lovely Silver Button with Him! She will never give that up!
So if the zero matrix becomes a 'one' matrix, there will always be 100 names for God, except His Most Holy Name becomes (101) which is the term used in theatrical parlance for stuff that is put in the room that no-one wants. (A Storehouse?)
Remember the American expession of spending your last dime! Well money is rubbish anyway when it's just electrical signals whizzing about.
Bring back Dubloons, and Guinies, Groats, and Montezuma's revenge! That crash was for for pinching all his Gold.
Besides, Silver has more value than Gold because there is less of it. And diamonds are more plentiful than sea shells!
Why do you think so many are locked up in safes, if they all came out on the market, none of them would have any value, unless they belonged to the Queen, or Elizabeth Taylor!
Ha! Rock on God, way to go!
Look up what a Silver Jubilee means in the Bible. That is the only way to get everybody on their feet again.
A little added note. (sorry about punning). An Abacus, which was one of the first methods of counting, magnifys the concept of the first line of beads on each line above. If I remember, I think there are 9 beads on a line, because when you get to 10, you move a bead on the next line up. Has anyone considered that the zero is the framework this is worked in. The matrix of the zero is how the abacus works. It also reflects the magnifying of 'power'.
So when we say we are multiplying by the 'power of' a number, we are actualy refering to the 'magnitude' of our own conceptual arrogance.
God doesn't experience our Universe as 'Big' or 'Small', He has set a limit on our 'vision'.
The story of the Tower of Babylon, was about how a civilisation crashed because of self idolatry.
God is God... Mankind is Mankind.
To clarify this distinction is to delineate a path through the sands of time. Indeed the sand itself does not pass through the hourglass, it rests in temporal equilibrium. My understanding in this inspiration of created order is that all things are renewed and re-inspired in the continuous outpouring of God's eternal light. I am reminded that Jesus drew a line in the sand during the accusation of the adulteress. This is the place of possibility.
To blur this distinction, and relinquish our unique relationship with a conscious, evolving plan of created order; naturally excludes humanity from the boundless energy that is God. In our own self addressed order we see the empiricism and finality of decay. This is the place of probability.
Anyway, I would imagine the known Universe, size, volume, is subject to geometric principles on the one hand, and on the other hand is pure energy that manifests into a coherent order as we ourselves define it. Which brings me back to the idea that in Genesis 1 God brought things to the Man so that he could 'name' them. We are still part of this progressive naming process by the look of it.
Ha... except God made the Woman from the Man, to act as antithesis to this desire to classify everthing to death!
God made the Woman (to) bear life. The Man (to) concieve (of) life.... Little bit chromatic perhaps?
This is realy a reflection of the way God does things.... The (of) is probably the empirical rule governed Universe, and the (to) is the infinately creative Universe.
They meet in the A......Ha! moment of realisation. Which is why we are told we are 'Co-Creators with God'.
Hmmm... what a load of Codswallop! Actually I wonder what kind of spanking God would discipline us all with these days?
I wonder if that's putting a little bubble round our imaginations, before we expand our own self importance beyond the realms of probability to absurdity.
Snaff, does this mean we have to work with the Possibility Universe after all.... Drach, and we were just getting used to the idea we could map it all out... What a lot of dosh that cost to find out!
For instance, I didn't like the idea of 0 or the 0 Matrix.
Frankly it just didn't make sense. Still I did learn it.
What I didn't like was that zero was a made up construct. It was a concept.
Nothing that I could see or touch was nothing, it was always something.
The thoughts of Nature having a 'nothing' was quite scary, especially when I read C.S.Lewis.
I didn't like the idea of 'Nothing' being able to eat up Everything. I didn't mind Binary, because then it was a symbol to say that the Nothing and the One were doing something useful together.
Anyway I was looking at some colour values for my picture of 'The Silver Tree at Loch Lomand' using the Munsell colour diagram.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munsell_color_system
Also having worked with the International Colour Code (ICC) for years since being a Hairdresser, (The first thing we learn about colouring Hair) It is a nice rational system to do all sorts of interesting things with colour.
I Suddenly realised that Miss Penny Lion's 'Special Silver Counting' Button is a very deep response in me, rejecting the whole concept of Maths as I was taught it.
I also have a very deep conviction that the more we try to calculate 'Nothing', the more we are creating a kind of 'void' that can't be filled. Like the prophetic narrative in C.S.Lewis.
As you have gathered I am deeply into Bible stuff. And I have been having some pretty wierd dreams lately!
How does it make you feel when someone says 'you have Nothing of value to me'? People always have something of value. It's just that you might not want to 'trade' with them.
I just suddenly realised that we have created 'Black Holes' in space.... mathematically. The maths we use says they are there. So we look so hard for them we wear out the garment of the night sky.
There isn't a 4th dimension, it is a mathematical construct. It collapses into 2 dimensional line. I know that from writing Orthodox Icons. The 'Line', is a defined boundry.
We can only construct The fourth dimension using a 0, a conceptual nothing. I am sorry but those '4 dimension' box diagrams just look like flat shapes to me.
This I am sure is why the first commandment says;
NIV (You would realy need a copy to see what I mean)Exodus CH19 v 25 ends;
So Moses went down to the people and told them.
Title; The Ten Commandments
a b
CH20 And God spoke ......... all these words
v2 I am the Lord Your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.
Well I am sorry but in my book slavery means working for NOTHING! and THATS A LOT OF NOTHING!
Verse 2 means to be saved from working hard without a sense of building something for the future. In this case it is probably translated as a homeland, and personal identity, as a corperate body of people, and as individuals and families.
The point I am making here is that God Created, and he didn't use a Zero! God didn't create Everything from Nothing, He made it as a reflection of His Pre-existancy. I think it might have just looked like a massive firework display, and you know how well planned they have to be to get a fantastic bit of illumination.
{ And God spoke....... all these words }
is the only un-numbered verse I have found in my Bible.
This verse has a Syntax of two parts. It represents the expanse of time and duration. It represents cogniscent clearly defined thought, and it represents a singular purpose. (Which is a tri-partate unison).
So if I were to write God mathematically it would be as a 1 and always as a one.
So I did a diagram at the top of the page.
The Ten Commandments are set out as Five positive Commands, and Five Negative Commands.
No Gaps!
1. You Shall have No other Gods Before Me.
2. You shall not make for yourself an Idol in the form of anything in the heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below.
3. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; ..... Jelous! Showing Love to a Thousand Generations.
4. You shall not misuse the name of the Lord Your God, ...
5. You Shall Remember the Sabbath.
6. Honour your Father and Mother
7. You shall not Murder
8. You shall not commit Adultery
9. You shall not steal
10. You shall not give false testamony against your Neighbour
11. a)You shall not covet your neighbours house. b)You shall not covet your neighbours wife. c) or his manservant or maidservant. d) His Ox or his donkey, (Read that as his car or his motorbike) c) or anything that belongs to your neighbour.
Thats odd, I seem to have upgraded part (b) of commantment two as I usually read it to being another whole commandment. We do seem to have a dreadful problem with 'idol' worship in this Babylon of a sociey we live in.
Or actually is that clause 2 in commandment ten that has the five codicils?
I have always had trouble counting these commandments, because I count a commandment starting with a 'You shall', or a 'You shall not'. I always got 11.
The Jesus commandment was 'To Love thy neighbour as thyself'. Well you can't love somebody else properly if you don't love God first. See Commandment 1... When you love God, you also have a deep respect for Him.
To have respect for God means you also have respect for yourself.
So to say we have 'self respect' when we do not have God at the absolute centre of our lives is the most scandalous IDOLATARY!!!
Anyway, you have just read the 'riot act', according to God.
Penny Lion is going to teach Tuppeny Bear to count without a Zero!
Just think of 1 being middle C on the Piano. It doesn't matter if you are going below middle C or above it, or which finger you play it with.
There just isn't a note on the Piano that doesn't play if it's hammer strikes home!
The reason I have never been able to get my head around the way other people think is Birthdays.
I will be '54' in August. Now to me, the day after my birthday, I am in my 55th year.
When I was born, I was in my first year. I was always 'nearly' my next birthday after my birthday.
I wonder if anyone has considered re-calculating that old Mayan prophecy with the lunar calender. Either the actual method of calculations they used, or using the planetary drift calculations since the last 25,000 years?
How about using the actual Jewish Lunar calender to calculate the Daniel dream, and all the other prophecies?
As far as I am concerned, If Tuppeny Bear spends all his Lovely Brown Buttons, Penny Lion will always be able to share Her Lovely Silver Button with Him! She will never give that up!
So if the zero matrix becomes a 'one' matrix, there will always be 100 names for God, except His Most Holy Name becomes (101) which is the term used in theatrical parlance for stuff that is put in the room that no-one wants. (A Storehouse?)
Remember the American expession of spending your last dime! Well money is rubbish anyway when it's just electrical signals whizzing about.
Bring back Dubloons, and Guinies, Groats, and Montezuma's revenge! That crash was for for pinching all his Gold.
Besides, Silver has more value than Gold because there is less of it. And diamonds are more plentiful than sea shells!
Why do you think so many are locked up in safes, if they all came out on the market, none of them would have any value, unless they belonged to the Queen, or Elizabeth Taylor!
Ha! Rock on God, way to go!
Look up what a Silver Jubilee means in the Bible. That is the only way to get everybody on their feet again.
A little added note. (sorry about punning). An Abacus, which was one of the first methods of counting, magnifys the concept of the first line of beads on each line above. If I remember, I think there are 9 beads on a line, because when you get to 10, you move a bead on the next line up. Has anyone considered that the zero is the framework this is worked in. The matrix of the zero is how the abacus works. It also reflects the magnifying of 'power'.
So when we say we are multiplying by the 'power of' a number, we are actualy refering to the 'magnitude' of our own conceptual arrogance.
God doesn't experience our Universe as 'Big' or 'Small', He has set a limit on our 'vision'.
The story of the Tower of Babylon, was about how a civilisation crashed because of self idolatry.
God is God... Mankind is Mankind.
To clarify this distinction is to delineate a path through the sands of time. Indeed the sand itself does not pass through the hourglass, it rests in temporal equilibrium. My understanding in this inspiration of created order is that all things are renewed and re-inspired in the continuous outpouring of God's eternal light. I am reminded that Jesus drew a line in the sand during the accusation of the adulteress. This is the place of possibility.
To blur this distinction, and relinquish our unique relationship with a conscious, evolving plan of created order; naturally excludes humanity from the boundless energy that is God. In our own self addressed order we see the empiricism and finality of decay. This is the place of probability.
Anyway, I would imagine the known Universe, size, volume, is subject to geometric principles on the one hand, and on the other hand is pure energy that manifests into a coherent order as we ourselves define it. Which brings me back to the idea that in Genesis 1 God brought things to the Man so that he could 'name' them. We are still part of this progressive naming process by the look of it.
Ha... except God made the Woman from the Man, to act as antithesis to this desire to classify everthing to death!
God made the Woman (to) bear life. The Man (to) concieve (of) life.... Little bit chromatic perhaps?
This is realy a reflection of the way God does things.... The (of) is probably the empirical rule governed Universe, and the (to) is the infinately creative Universe.
They meet in the A......Ha! moment of realisation. Which is why we are told we are 'Co-Creators with God'.
Hmmm... what a load of Codswallop! Actually I wonder what kind of spanking God would discipline us all with these days?
I wonder if that's putting a little bubble round our imaginations, before we expand our own self importance beyond the realms of probability to absurdity.
Snaff, does this mean we have to work with the Possibility Universe after all.... Drach, and we were just getting used to the idea we could map it all out... What a lot of dosh that cost to find out!